Assignments

Over the course of the yearlong seminar, faculty discussed readings and experimented with new assignments in class. Below is a quick overview of some of these assignments. Click on provided links to see the abstracts and assignments in full.

2017-18 Fellows

Military & Ethics: Shannon Proctor

Intended class: Liberal Arts capstone class on Technoethics

Assignment type and time required: Low-stakes & multi-stage; covers 2 class periods and a few hours outside class

Connection to seminar: 1) the content of the assignment is explicitly about the military and ethics and 2) the collaborative aspects of the assignment model the approach we used throughout the seminar.

Click here to see the full abstract & assignment.

Photography, War, and the Ethics of Spectatorship: Chris Schmidt

Intended class: English 101, College Composition 

Assignment type and time required: Low-stakes; one 2 hour class period

Connection to seminar: seminar’s focus on war & torture

Read the abstract & full assignment here. 

Militarization of the Police: Colleen Eren

Intended class: Crime and Justice in Urban Society (SSN 204, Criminal Justice major capstone)

Assignment type and time required: low-stakes; 2 hours out-of-class, with follow-up discussion in class

Connection to seminar: The assignment was changed to include a focus on excitement and how that might affect the desire to engage in war after we heard Chris Hedges speak in our Meanings of Warseminar where he discussed his book, War is a Force that Gives Us Meaning.

Open the abstract and assignment here.

War & Knowledge Production: LaRose T. Parris

Intended class: Honors course in African American Literature (ENG 224)

Assignment type and time required: Low-stakes assignment; a few hours

Connection to seminar: The assignment is on the historiographical and epistemological consequences of the Reconquista, which engendered an irrevocable shift in global perceptions of African people, history, culture, and knowledge production in the West–including the long-term socio-political and cultural implications of revisionist historiography initiated by prominent Western philosophers and historians.

Read Dr. Parris’s abstract & assignment here. 

Wartime Propaganda: Robin Kietlinski

Intended class: East Asian Civilizations (SSH 110, non-majors survey course), can also be used for World History from 1500 (SSH 106) and Modern Japanese History (SSH 114)

Assignment type and time required: formal written assignment towards end of semester; approximately two weeks to complete

Connection to seminar: This is a new assignment that was inspired entirely by the “Meanings of War” seminar. Specifically, November’s “Mediations of War” readings and discussion reminded me of the many powerful wartime propaganda posters (on both the Japanese and the American side) that I have come across over the years. 

Click here for the full assignment and propaganda posters.

Ethics of War Project: Dana Trusso

Intended class: Ethics & Moral Issues (HUP 104, non-majors)

Assignment type and time required: formal project with debate, peer review, and critical response essay; four weeks

Connection to seminar: The NEH “Meanings of War” inspired the project, especially the issue of the most ethical practices during war using the bombing of Hiroshima as a case study. 

Read a full overview of the project and all its particulars here.

Non-Violence & Low-Intensity War: Maria Hart

Intended class: Introduction to Cultural Anthropology

Assignment type and time required: formal written assignment; takes place over 6 weeks

Connection to seminar: The Ejército Zapatista de Liberación Nacional (EZLN) was a homegrown indigenous army that rose against the Mexican government in 1994, in order to make its voice heard. It put down its weapons after only twelve days of fighting and soon turned to non-violent tactics, even though the government would soon paramilitarize the Chiapas countryside in a low-intensity war. This assignment teases out the meanings of non-violence to an initially violent army, and the effectiveness of the non-violent tactics to the conflict’s outcome, as explored in the NEH seminar.

Read the full assignment here.

The Korean War & Contemporary North Korea: Rebecca Tally

Intended class: Liberal Arts capstone (LIB 200) focused on the history of the Cold War and its legacy

Assignment type and time required: low-stakes; no more than an hour and a half in class time

Connection to seminar:  I first learned of the article used in this assignment, Andrei Lankov’s “Kim Jong Un is a Survivor, Not a Madman,” through the Meanings of War seminar. One of the seminar participants assigned it to the seminar in preparation for a discussion of nuclear weapons. The Meanings of War seminar helped me develop this assignment, in both content and form.

View the assignment here.

The Atomic Bomb: Tomonori Imamichi

Intended class: Social Psychology/SSY250 (taken by Psychology majors, and advanced students)

Assignment type and time required: written formal assignment; two weeks

Connection to seminar: Parts of this assignment were developed with my colleague Robin Kietlinski for the “Meanings of War” seminar for the semester that focused on nuclear technologies. 

Read the full assignment here.

Morphology & The Spanish American War: Zena Cooper

Intended class: ELL 101

Assignment type and time required: low-stakes; about one class period

Connection to seminar: Based on the seminar, I designed this assignment to include the Spanish American War as medium to teach morphology, which is a branch of linguistics.  I was successfully able to incorporate and connect two different areas of study with a goal of students to have some knowledge of the Spanish American war and improve their morphology skills using propaganda posters.

Open the assignment here.

2018-19 Fellows

A Minute for an Image: Evelyn Burg

Intended Class: ENG102 (Writing Through Literature)

Assignment type and time required: Low stakes, one two-hour class period

Connection to seminar: My ENG102 class is focused on post-WWII literature and was developed entirely in the seminar. My colleague Chris Schmidt and I both are interested in photography and presented a session (using the readings above) on how photographic images of war have complex moral valences and thus present multi-layered issues of interpretation with clear analogies to interpreting literary texts. The students at LaGuardia may often be better readers of images than written text and this assignment allows them to use that experience as a form of access to ambiguous written text.

Read the abstract and assignment here.

Historical Thinking Beyond the Classroom: Robin Kietlinski

Intended Class: SSH 106 (World History from 1500) and/or SSH 110 (East Asian Civilizations)

Assignment type and time required: High-stakes, one week

Connection to seminar: The assignment is a reflective, end-of-term writing assignment that is meant to both draw out and synthesize themes about refugees and war from The Displaced: Refugee Writers on Refugee Lives, and to get students to consider the transferrable skills they can take away from the course. The readings for this assignment came directly from the Spring 2019 NEH seminar syllabus. The assignment was developed for the seminar, and was workshopped and improved upon by my colleagues’ feedback.

Read the abstract and assignment here.

Who or What is a Refugee?: Arianna Martinez

Intended Class: LIB200(Humanism, Science, and Technology)

Assignment type and time required: low stakes; 2 weeks

Connection to seminar: The assignment is connected to the “Meanings of War” seminar through the discussion of refugee policy. The seminar introduced me to the book, The Displaced, and I have added three essays from that book into my curriculum.

Click here for the abstract and assignment.

 

War, Photography, and Empathy: Chris Schmidt

Intended Class: LIB200 (Humanism, Science, and Technology)

Assignment type and time required: three-and-a-half weeks; high stakes (includes in-class low-stakes activities and peer-review).

Connection to seminar: This assignment is for a section of LIB200, the capstone course for Liberal Arts Majors. The assignment’s theme—media representations of war—addresses the course theme of “Humanism, Science, and Technology.” As a scaffolded writing assignment, it also aligns with the writing-intensive aspects of LIB200. The assignment draws on readings about war photography, empathy, and the torture at Abu Ghraib that we read and discussed in the “Meanings of War” seminar. Helpful feedback from colleagues in small-group peer review helped me clarify the staging of the assignment.

Read the abstract and assignment here.

Reflection and Context in the Personal Essay: Laura Tanenbaum

Intended Class: ENG 274, (Creative Non-Fiction)

Assignment type and time required: low stakes; one 2-hour class period

Connection to seminar: The assignment came directly out of the “Meanings of War” seminar. I had proposed a reading of The Displaced, and edited collection in which Nayeri’s essay appeared. The seminar discussion of that volume heightened some of my sense of the possibilities and contradictions of Nayeri’s essay, such as her assessment of teaching narratives of exile to privilege students and how LaGuardia students might both react differently and respond to those reactions. I workshopped a version of the assignment, during which time other participants encouraged me to offer more specific context about the causes and politics of exile as a basis and model for the discussion and suggested a rubric to evaluate their completion of the various stages of the assignment.

See the abstract and assignment here.

Crossing Borders: Phyllis van Slyck

Intended Class: ENG101 (Composition I)

Assignment type and time required: high stakes; three weeks

Connection to seminar: In the Meanings of War Seminar, we examined numerous primary and secondary critical and literary texts, as well as photographs and documentaries, to gain a more nuanced understanding of the ways war continues to inhabit peoples’ lives.  For the assignments I developed during the seminar, I was particularly interested in the ways stories and photographs of “displacement” might be used to tap into and enlarge students’ understanding of their own experiences and of events unfolding daily in the news since our administration introduced the “immigration crisis.” Each week we discussed new developments in the news and we came to characterize the events at the border, and decisions regarding immigration status of different groups as a kind of “war at home.”  Students wrote about their own experiences of migration to avoid local violence and seek asylum, and about their status as Deferred Action Childhood Arrivals.  We watched documentaries about families fleeing war-torn countries such as Syria. I revised these assignments on a weekly basis and each of the Meanings of War Seminars gave me new materials.

Read the abstract and assignment here.

Economic Impact of War: Neetu Kaushik

Intended Class: SSE104 (Introduction to Macroeconomics)

Assignment type and time required: Low-stakes; 4-5 hours

Connection to seminar: The assignment discusses the impact of war on the economy, business and individuals. The Meaning of War seminar helped in providing insights about war impacts on the economic condition of the affected countries.

Read the abstract and assignment here.

The Roots and Consequences of Armed Conflict: Alcira Forero-Pena

Intended Class: SSA101 (Cultural Anthropology)

Assignment type and time required: low stakes; one hour

Connection to seminar: State Formation, State and Nation, and Warfare in States are very important sections in the discussion of Political Anthropology. The reading material, discussions, and overall presentations by the members of the Seminar, “Meanings of War” provided insights as well as diverse perspectives to think –and rethink the subject of war.

Click here to read the abstract and assignment.

 Meanings of the “Banner” In and Through Times of War: Will Fulton

Intended Class: HUM (210 American Music)

Assignment type and time required: low stakes; 3-5 hours

Connection to seminar: This assignment was inspired by readings and discussion in the NEH-funded “Meanings of War” 2018-19 seminar, and developed for and workshopped in seminar meetings. Feedback from colleagues at Meanings of War meetings prompted revisions to the assignment, such as the inclusion of a recent performance of the “Star Spangled Banner” in which Colin Kaepernick chose to kneel, prompting a national debate.

Read the abstract and assignment here.

Defining War: Dave Hill

Intended Class: SSP101 (Power and Politics)

Assignment type and time required: low stakes; 2 hours

Connection to seminar:Two elements of the seminar were especially important: First, this seminar was an extremely important in thinking through “non-state” views of war. Of course, states are closely connected to war, but within mainstream history and political science, organized and explicit state action is perceived to be a necessary condition for a state of war. However, just as non-state actors can also engage in actions very like war, states can engage in wars that are subtle or secret. This could take the form of paramilitary action but it could take the form of exclusion and withholding of needed rights, services and sustenance from targeted or marginalized groups. Second, this seminar has been a tremendous help in understanding how this just mentioned form of subtle state war fare is used commonly in neo-liberal or colonial pursuits. It is tempting to think that most wars are official and recognized—however, if we include the steady stream of colonial aggressions as a form of war—then we could be justified in concluding that most modern war are NOT official and go unrecorded as acts of war.

Read the abstract and assignment here.